Intermountain Power Agency
Board R. Leon Bowler, Representing the
City of Enterprise, Russell F. Fjeldsted, Representing Logan City, Fred Moss, Representing
the City of Bountiful, Ted L. Olson – Chariman, Representing the Cities of
Ephraim & Fairview, Robert Christiansen, Representing Beaver City (Term
Expired December 31, 2011), Walter Meacham, Representing Kaysville City, Ed
Collins, Representing Lehi City (not in picture above)
Blaine
Haacke, Representing Murray City (not in picture above)
Should
Utah law change to allow Intermountain Power Project to sell more than 50% of
its available power to entities outside of Utah? How will this financially impact the cost of power in Utah?
Senate
Bill 94, allows Intermountain Power Project (IPP) to sell more than 50 percent
of its available power to entities outside of Utah. Right now, IPP is required
to sell 50 percent of its power to customers inside the state, but if it
switches to natural gas it will be able to produce more electricity and will
need to sell more power outside Utah.
Intermountain
Power Project is near Delta. IPP generates an average of more than 13 million
megawatt hours of energy each year from its two coal-fired units, according to
its website, IPP web site . The
energy is delivered over the project's transmission systems to 36 participants
in the project that principally serve Utah and Southern California.
SB94 passed the Senate on February 24 with a 23-4 vote and 2 absent or not voting. Casey Anderson, D Hinkins, S Reid, and L Robles all voted against the bill, while Hillyard and Niederhauser did not vote. Senate Vote SB 94
No comments:
Post a Comment