Ben Franklin may not having been saving candlewax by springing forward.
As we prepare to lose an hour of sleep to Daylight Saving Time,
which begins in the wee hours of Sunday March 10, we can take no solace
from a 2008 Journal article that notes our sacrifice for springing forward does little to save energy. Read an excerpt below:
For decades, conventional wisdom has held that daylight-saving time
reduces energy use. But a unique situation in Indiana provides evidence
challenging that view: Springing forward may actually waste energy.
Up until two years ago, only 15 of Indiana’s 92 counties set their
clocks an hour ahead in the spring and an hour back in the fall. The
rest stayed on standard time all year, in part because farmers resisted
the prospect of having to work an extra hour in the morning dark. But
many residents came to hate falling in and out of sync with businesses
and residents in neighboring states and prevailed upon the Indiana
Legislature to put the entire state on daylight-saving time beginning in
the spring of 2006.
Indiana’s change of heart gave University of California-Santa Barbara economics professor Matthew Kotchen and Ph.D. student Laura Grant a unique way to see how the time shift affects energy use. Using more than seven million monthly meter readings from Duke Energy
Corp., covering nearly all the households in southern Indiana for three
years, they were able to compare energy consumption before and after
counties began observing daylight-saving time. Readings from counties
that had already adopted daylight-saving time provided a control group
that helped them to adjust for changes in weather from one year to the
next.
Their finding: Having the entire state switch to daylight-saving time
each year, rather than stay on standard time, costs Indiana households
an additional $8.6 million in electricity bills. They conclude that the
reduced cost of lighting in afternoons during daylight-saving time is
more than offset by the higher air-conditioning costs on hot afternoons
and increased heating costs on cool mornings.
“I’ve never had a paper with such a clear and unambiguous finding as this,” says Mr. Kotchen, who presented the paper at a National Bureau of Economic Research conference.
A 2007 study by economists Hendrik Wolff and Ryan Kellogg
of the temporary extension of daylight-saving in two Australian
territories for the 2000 Summer Olympics also suggested the clock change
increases energy use.
That isn’t what Benjamin Franklin would have expected. In 1784, he
observed what an “immense sum! that the city of Paris might save every
year, by the economy of using sunshine instead of candles.” (Mr.
Franklin didn’t propose setting clocks forward, instead he satirically
suggested levying a tax on window shutters, ringing church bells at
sunrise and, if that didn’t work, firing cannons down the street in
order to rouse Parisians out of their beds earlier.)
Wall Street Journal. U S Edition. Wednesday March 13, 2013.
Wallstreet Journal. Feb. 27, 2008
No comments:
Post a Comment