Saturday, August 16, 2014

"Democrats should focus less on fabricating conspiracy theories and slinging mud, and focus more on nominating candidates," Utah County Republican Chairman Casey Voeks.Voeks said. Daily Herald.

                                      Casey Voeks Utah County Republican Party Chair
Democrats question timing of Valentine's resignation from Senate
Utah Democrats are taking issue with the timing Sen. John Valentine will follow to resign from his seat in the state senate. 
While Valentine has been appointed by Gov. Gary Herbert to become the next chairman of the Utah Tax Commission, he will not resign from his seat until he is confirmed for his new position by his senate colleagues.
State Democratic party chairman Peter Corroon has said Valentine is gaming the system to allow for a Republican to be appointed to the seat instead of allowing voters choose his replacement in the November general election. 
"It is not possible to believe in representative government and then circumvent it," Corroon said in written statement.

"The voters in this senate district will not have any kind of say in who represents them for the next two years. That is not Republican, not Democratic, and you would think Republicans would be upset about that." 

Under state law, if a legislative seat faces a mid-term vacancy in an election year, an election is to be held to fill the vacancy if the outgoing legislator resigns from the seat prior to Aug. 31. If the candidate resigns after that time, the seat is filled by an appointment from the governor. 

In Valentine's case, it was announced earlier this month he would be leaving the senate, but he is not expected to resign until he is confirmed. When contacted Friday by the Daily Herald about the situation, Valentine said his intentions are not to protect the seat from any election but to ensure the seat is not left vacant for a period of time while a replacement is found. 
"I will resign once I get confirmed, then I can do an orderly transition," Valentine said. 
The Orem Republican said he talked with Corroon on Thursday and explained his stance on the issue. Valentine said the two agreed to disagree on the matter. 
If all goes as planned, Valentine will be confirmed at the legislature's next interim day in September.

The legislature took August off for a summer break. He then is expected to resign, and Republican delegates from his district will select a candidate to fill his seat for the remainder of his term, which is set for two more years. 
That candidate's name will then be forwarded to the governor to be appointed. Once appointed, the new state senator would be sworn in by the Senate President. 
The Utah County Republican Party has not officially laid out a timetable for when it will replace Valentine. Party officials have said the plan is to wait to begin the process until Valentine officially steps down. 
"Senator Valentine has indicated that it would be inappropriate, and even presumptuous, to resign from office before the Utah State Senate votes on whether or not to confirm him," said Utah County Republican Chairman Casey Voeks. "It is disingenuous to suggest that this is a politically timed decision, as no such discussion has ever taken place between party leaders and Senator Valentine."

Voeks went on to point out that the Democrats have not fielded a candidate in Valentine's district in the past two general elections, and speculated a Democratic candidate would struggle to win even if an election were to happen to fill the vacancy left by Valentine. 
"Democrats should focus less on fabricating conspiracy theories and slinging mud, and focus more on nominating candidates," Voeks said. 
The likelihood that a Democrat would win Valentine's seat appears to be slim. No Democrat has held a legislative office in Utah County since 1996, and the last time Valentine was challenged by a Democrat, in 2004, he won the election with 80 percent of the vote. 

Corroon said that is beside the point.

"People ought to be able to choose who they want to represent them," he said. "It is a fundamental premise of representative democracy, and it is violated in this case." 

No comments: