Much has
changed in Utah State Law on how cities can offer tax increment incentives to
businesses.
The
Woodbury CDA
"Last
year the city council approved a rezone of the area that is proposed to be
included in a new University Place Community Development Project Area,"
said Brenn Bybee, assistant city manager. "Since the rezone of the
University Place area, Woodbury Corporation began meeting with city officials
about the prospect of creating a new CDA associated with this area."
"This
CDA isn't benefiting any one business but the whole area," said Mayor
Richard Brunst. "This is not about incentivizing a particular
tenant. It's about infrastructure, a park, roads, and parking facilities."
Some
common uses of CDA funds include; providing funds to upgrade private and public
facilities, funding infrastructure improvements, purchasing land, providing
development incentives, pledging funds to repay or secure bonds, etc.
"Each
project area type is envisioned to address specific sets of circumstances and
thus have different nuances, purposes, and abilities," Bybee said.
"The University Place CDA plan and budget would identify the details
associated with any potential tax increment financing that might be used to
replace, expand or improve the infrastructure that directly benefits its
particular project area."
Kathy
Olson of Woodbury said the job creation through this project will be a great
benefit to the area. Without the CDA, Woodbury would be building one office
building, but with the CDA it plans on five. It's estimated that this will
create about 8,000 jobs during the construction of the project and about 4,000
jobs from the companies that locate to University Place.
Brunst is
very clear on the benchmarks for Woodbury to get the money. It is a
post-performance property tax increment subsidy.
"This
is a 22-year CDA. The money will only come from property tax on new growth and if
they perform." Brunst said. "This will lift all the boats. It is a
post-performance tax credit. We're not spending any money."
Andersen
said the city has spent too much time and money on the big guys and has asked
what they will do help keep established businesses from leaving or going under.
"There
are 2,533 business store fronts in Orem," Andersen said. He said he wants
to know what makes Woodbury any better than them.
Davidson
said that Andersen shouldn't be confused about the money or how it is used. He
has received the same information the mayor has.
"The
mall is the goose that produces the eggs," Davidson said. "If you
don't feed the goose, it won't produce the eggs."
On July
22 the RDA passed funding, to the tune of $35,000, for the budget to make a
plan, budget, and time table. Woodbury will reimburse the funding.
"No
decisions have been made," Davidson said. "We have decided to explore
its potential. Before the city council takes action there is a public comment
time. It will be at least October before a vote would be taken."
"We
have been very transparent with the public." Brunst said. "We've been
elected to study these issues in an open and public meeting."
Davidson
said, "In the 1990s the option to do what we're doing didn't exist. It's a
reimbursement agreeing to build all the infrastructure. Woodbury will receive
reimbursement over time. It is dependent on the mall performing. It's not free
money, nor are we taking money from the residents."
There are
five taxing entities involved, Orem, Utah County, Alpine School district;
Central Water Conservancy District, and the Metropolitan Water Board. Orem
would only be required to give 15 percent of the whole amount.
The total
amount has yet to be determined. The city is waiting to hear from the last
taxing entity, the Alpine School District. They have agreed to the project buy
have yet to say what they are going to offer.
Orem city
must have a time for resident comments. That is the same for all of the taxing
entities.
"A
similar process must go forward through all these entities," Davidson
said. "It's been a public process all along the way. Woodbury has been a
wonderful partner with Orem for years. We're grateful for the company. They
want to see the city progress as much as we do.
"We
would not be good leaders if we did not invest in the future," Brunst
said. "Back in December I said I believe in the mall and what they are doing."
From all
that Brunst has voiced since December that belief has not changed, but gotten
stronger.
No comments:
Post a Comment